C. STRONG VERB WITH PRONOMINAL SUFFIXES.¹

§ 57.

The accusative of the personal pronoun, depending on an active verb,², may be expressed (1) by a separate word, tae the accusative sign (before a suffix ta,àtao) with the pronominal suffix, e. g. Atao lj;q' he has killed him; or (2) by a mere suffix, Whl'ñj'q. or Alj'q. he has killed him. The latter is the usual method (§ 33), and we are here concerned with it alone.³ Neither of these methods, however, is employed when the accusative of the pronoun is reflexive. In that case a reflexive verb is used, viz. NiphÇal or HithpaÇeÒl (§§ 51 and 54), e. g. vDeq;t.hi he sanctified himself, not AvD>qi, which could only mean he sanctified him.⁴

Two points must be specially considered here: the form of the suffix itself (§ 58), and the form which the verb takes when suffixes are added to it (§§ 59–61)).

Footnotes:

¹[1] This subject of the verbal suffixes is treated here in connexion with the strong verb, in order that both the forms of the suffixes and the general laws which regulate their union union verbal forms may be clearly seen. The rules which relate to the union of the suffixes with weak verbs will be given under the several classes of those verbs.

²[2] An accusative suffix occurs with NiphÇal in y Ps 109:3 (since ~x;l.nI is used in the sense of to attack), and according to some, in Is 44:21; with HithpaÇeÒl Is 14:2 (lxen:t.hi to appropriate somebody to oneself as a possession); cf. above, § 54 f, and § 117 w.

³[3] On the cases where tae is necessary, see § 117 e.

⁴[4] The exceptions in Jer 7:19, Ez 34:2, 8, 10 are only apparent. In all these instances the sharp antithesis between ~t'ao (themselves) and another object could only be expressed by retaining the same verb; also in Ex 5:19 ~t'ao after an active verb serves to emphasize the idea of themselves.