§ 109. Use of the Jussive.

a

As the cohortative is used in the 1st pers., so the jussive is especially found in the 2nd and 3rd pers. sing. and plur. to express a more or less definite desire that something should or should not happen (cf. for its form, which frequently coincides with that of the ordinary imperfect,1 § 48 f, g). More particularly its uses may be distinguished as follows:

1. The jussive standing alone, or co-ordinated with another jussive:

b

(a) In affirmative sentences to express a command, a wish (or a blessing), advice, or a request; in the last case (the optative or precative) it is frequently strengthened by the addition of an". Examples: Gn 1:3 rAa yhiy> let there be light ! Gn 1:6, 9, 11, &c. (the creative commands); Nu 6:26 the Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace ! cf. verse 25. After particles expressing a wish, Gn 30:34 yhiy> Wl I would it might be; y Ps 81:9 yli-[m;v.Ti-~ai if thou wouldest hearken unto me ! As a humble request, Gn 44:33 … l[;y:ò r[;N:òh;w> … ^D>b.[; an"-bv,y)e let thy servant, I pray thee, abide, &c., and let the lad go up, &c., Gn 47:4.

c

(b) In negative sentences to express prohibition or dissuasion, warning, a negative wish (or imprecation), and a request. The prohibitive particle used before the jussive (according to § 107 o) is almost always -la; (in negative desires and requests frequently an"-la; ); e.g. Ex 34:3 ar'yE-la; vyai neither let any man be seen ! Pr 3:7 be not ( yhiT.-la; ) wise in thine own eyes ! Jb 15:31 !mea]y);-la; ne confidat. In the form of a request (prayer), Dt 9:26 txev.T;-la; destroy not ! 1 K 2:20, y Ps 27:9, 69:18.

d

Rem. 1. The few examples of aol with the jussive could at most have arisen from the attempt to moderate subsequently by means of the jussive (voluntative) form what was at first intended to be a strict command ( aol with imperf. indic.); probably, however, they are either cases in which the defective writing has been misunderstood (as in 1 K 2:6, Ez 48:14), or (as in Gn 24:8) instances of the purely rhythmical jussive form treated below, under k. Moreover, cf. @seAy aol Jo 2:2 and from the same verb Gn 4:12 (unless it is to be referred to h) and Dt 13:1. The same form, however, appears also to stand three times for the cohortative (see below), and in Nu 22:19 for the ordinary imperfect (but see below, i). Thus it is doubtful whether an imaginary by-form of the ordinary imperf. is not intended by the Masora in all these cases, and whether consequently @siAy, &c., should not be restored.—On ^n>y[†e sAxt'-aol†, &c., Dt 7:16, 13:9, &c., Ez 5:11, &c., cf. § 72 r, according to which sWxt' should probably be read in every case.—The jussive appears in the place of the cohortative after aol 1 S 14:36 ( raev.n:-aol†w> co-ordinated with two cohortatives), 2 S 17:12; cf. Is 41:23 Keth. ( arnw, i.e. ar,nEòw>, after another cohortative); also (see above) @seao aol Dt 18:16, Ho 9:15, and even without aol Ez 5:16.

e

2. -la; with the jussive (or imperf., cf. § 107 p) is used sometimes to express the conviction that something cannot or should not happen; cf. Is 2:9 (where, however, the text is very doubtful) ~h,l' aF'Ti-la;w> and thou canst not possibly forgive them [R. V. therefore forgive them not]; y Ps 34:6, 41:3, 50:3, 121:3 ( !TeyI-la; ); Pr 3:25, Jb 5:22 ar'yTi-la; neither needest thou be afraid; 20:17, 40:32.

f

2. The jussive depending on other moods, or in conditional sentences:

(a) Depending2 (with WaÒw) on an imperative or cohortative to express an intention or an assurance of a contingent occurrence, e.g. Gn 24:51 take her and go, and let her be ( yhit.W prop. and she will be) …; 30:3, 31:37, 38:24, Ex 8:4, 9:13, 10:17, 14:2, Jos 4:16, Ju 6:30, 1 S 5:11, 7:3, 1 K 21:10, y Ps 144:5, Pr 20:22, Jb 14:6. Also after interrogative sentences, which include a demand, Est 7:2 (say) what is thy desire …, f['tew> and it shall (i.e. in order that it may) be granted ! 1 K 22:20, Is 19:12, Jb 38:34f Depending on a cohortative, e.g. Gn 19:20 hM'v'ñ aN" hj'l.M†'ai oh, let me escape thither … yvip.n: yxit.W that my soul may live; even after a simple imperf. (cf. below, g), 1 K 13:33 whosoever would, he consecrated him … yhiywI that he might be a priest (read !heKo ) of the high places, but probably the LXX reading yhiy>w: is to be preferred.

g

Rem. In 2 Ch 35:21 a negative final clause with -la;w> is dependent on an imperative, forbear from (meddling with) God … that he destroy thee not. As a rule, however, negative final clauses are attached to the principal sentence by means of aolw> and a following imperfect; so after an imperative, Gn 42:2, 1 K 14:2, 18:44; after a jusaive, Ex 30:20, Neh 6:9; after a perfect consec., Ex 28:35, 43, 30:12, Nu 18:5; after aol with an imperfect, Lv 10:6, Nu 18:9, Dt 17:17 neither shall he multiply wives unto himself ( Abb'l. rWsy" aolw> ) that his heart turn not away; 1 S 20:14, 2 S 21:17, Jer 11:21; after -la; with jussive, Lv 10:9, 11:43, 16:2, 2 S 13:25, Jer 25:6, 37:20, 38:24 f.; after the asseverative ~ai with the impft., Gn 14:23; even after a simple imperfect, Jer 10:4 with nails … they fasten it ( qypiy" aolw> ) that it move not; after a participle, Jb 9:7.

h

(b) Frequently in conditional sentences (as in Arabic), either in the protasis or in the apodosis, cf. y Ps 45:12 wa;t.yI should he desire … then …; 104:20 yhiywI … tv,T'ñ if thou makest darkness, then it is night; so also in the protasis, Ex 22:4, Lv 15:24, Is 41:28, Ez 14:7 ( l[;y:òw> ), Jb 34:29; in the apodosis, Ex 7:9 then will it (not, then shall it) become a serpent; Pr 9:9 after an imperat. in the protasis; Jb 10:16, 13:5, 22:28. In a negative apodosis, Gn 4:12 ( @seto-aol†, but see above, d). In 2 K 6:27 %[eviAy)-la; (if the Lord do not help thee, &c.) is to be explained as a jussive in a negative protasis.

i

Rem. Undoubtedly this use of the jussive (in conditional sentences) is based on its original voluntative meaning; let something be so and so, then this or that must happen as a consequence. Certain other examples of the jussive, however, show that in the consciousness of the language the voluntative has in such cases become weakened almost to a potential mood, and hence the jussive serves to express facts which may happen contingently, or may be expected, e.g. Nu 22:19 ( @seYO-hm;, but cf. above, d); Jb 9:33 there is no daysman betwixt us, that might lay ( tvey", hence plainly a subjunctive = qui ponat; also in Nu 23:19 bZEk;yw)i that he should lie is probably intended as a jussive); Ec 5:14; so after interrogative sentences, Jer 9:11 who is the wise man, !bey"w> qui intelligat hoc?; Ho 14:10.

k

Moreover, in not a few cases, the jussive is used, without any collateral sense, for the ordinary imperfect form. and this occurs not alone in forms, which mayarise from a misunderstanding of the defective writing, as Dt 28:21, 36, 32:8, 1 K 8:1, Is 12:1, Mi 3:4, 5:8, y Ps 11:6, 18:12, 21:2, QereÖ ( lg<Y"ò-hm;, Keth. lygIy" ), 25:9, 47:4, 90:3, 91:4, 107:29, Pr 15:25, Jb 13:27, 15:33, 18:9, 20:23, 37:22, 33:11, 36:14, 38:24 Ec 12:6 (verse 7 bvoy", but immediately afterwards bWvT' ), Dn 8:12, —but also in shortened forms, such as yhiy> Gn 49:17 (Sam. hy<h.yI ), Dt 28:8, 1 S 10:5, 2 S 5:24, Ho 6:1, 11:4, Am 5:14, Mi 1:2, Zp 2:13, Zc 9:5, y Ps 72:16 f. (after other jussives), 104:31, Jb 18:12, 20:28, 26, 28, 27:8, 33:21, 34:37, Ru 3:4. This use of the jussive can hardly be due merely to poetic licence, but is rather to be explained on rhythmical grounds. In all the above-cited examples, in fact, the jussive stands at the beginning of the sentence (and hence removed as far as possible from the principal tone), in others it is immediately before the principal pauae (Is 42:6, 50:2, y Ps 68:15, Pr 23:25, Jb 24:14, 29:3, 40:19), or actually in pause (Dt 32:18, Jb 23:9, 11, La 3:50), and is then a simply rhythmical shortening due to the strong influence of the tone. Moreover, since the jussive in numerous cases is not distinguished in form from the imperfect (§ 48 g), it is frequently doubtful which of the two the writer intended. This especially applies to those cases, in which a subjunctitve is to be expressed by one or other of the forms (cf. § 107 k and m–x).

Footnotes:

1[2] With regard to verbs h¾¾l, it is true that the full form of the imperfect is frequently used with the meaning of the jussive (as also for the cohortative, see § 108 a, note 2), e.g. ha,r>yI-la; Jb 3:9 (but previously wq;y> let it look for !): especially in (Neh 2:3) and immediately before the principal pause, Gn 1:9 ha,r'T†e; Ju 6:39 hy<h.y)i, but previously an"-yhiy>; Is 47:3 ha,r'T†e, proviously lG"Ti; y Ps 109:7. On the attempt to distinguish such jussives from the imperfect by means of a special meaning h¤e, see § 75 hh.

2[1] This does not include the cases in which the jussive is not logicnlly dependent on a preceding imperat., but is merely co-ordinated, e.g. Gn 20:7, y Ps 27:14, &c.